Marianne Boesky, New York, May 1 to June 14, 2025





Ghada Amer’s exhibition Disobedient Thoughts at Marianne Boesky Gallery in Chelsea, presented in spring 2025, offered a lucid and forceful summation of her long-standing project: to unsettle the hierarchies that separate abstraction from figuration, craft from high modernism, and private desire from public form. Installed across the gallery’s West 24th Street space, the show combined large-scale embroidered paintings with a suite of compact sculptures.
The paintings announce Amer’s method through contradiction. From a distance, several canvases read as exercises in modernist discipline, such as grids, nested squares, vertical bands. These recall canonical figures such as Mondrian or Albers. Up close, however, these structures are disrupted by cascades of hand-embroidered thread that slip, knot, and pool across the surface. The thread, often attached with gel medium, refuses the crisp authority of paint. It sags and tangles, asserting gravity and the unmistakable presence of the artist’s hand. Amer’s signature strategy, overlaying abstract order with unruly materiality, here feels less oppositional than accumulative.
Two monumental square works, each roughly eight feet across and collectively titled My Homage to the Square, operate as the exhibition’s conceptual anchors. Their concentric geometries nod explicitly to Josef Albers, yet Amer’s surfaces don’t try for optical stability. Threads in saturated reds, blues, greens, and blacks drift across the squares, partially veiling the underlying structure and collapsing figure and ground.
Elsewhere, large vertical and horizontal canvases, such as The Grid of 2025 and The Ladies of Giverny, extend this logic. Here, the grid becomes a field of tension rather than control, its lines softened and destabilized by embroidered flows that recall both textile traditions and the ornamental excess — normally excluded from modernist taste. In the expansive Les Grands Nymphéas, Amer pushes this sensibility toward near-total: dense skeins of color accumulate into a surface with elements of painting, drawing, and textile relief.
The exhibition’s sculptural component, grouped under the title Thoughts, provides a crucial counterpoint. Small, biomorphic forms, modeled, in some cases, with Amer’s non-dominant hand, sit on plinths or shelves, their rough textures and compact scale encouraging intimate viewing. Cast in bronze or steel and occasionally paired with vividly colored bases, these objects read as three-dimensional equivalents of the paintings’ tangled lines. They are anti-monumental: portable, provisional, and suggestive. In the context of the gallery, they slow the viewer down, offering moments of concentration amid the visual abundance of the wall works.
What distinguishes Disobedient Thoughts from earlier presentations of Amer’s work is its tonal confidence. In Chelsea, a context still closely associated with market-driven spectacle and stylistic branding, Amer’s show stood out for its refusal of easy legibility. Disobedient Thoughts asked viewers to linger with surfaces that are seductive and unruly. It was an exhibition that reaffirmed Amer’s position not only as a critical voice within feminist art discourse, but as a sustained and serious interlocutor of abstraction itself.
























